CHAPTERS
6,7,8 AND 9
1)
Defective Contracts
·
Rescissible Contracts –
contracts that are valid because all the essential requisites are met but by
reason of injury or damage caused to one of the parties or third person, it may
be rescinded.
·
Voidable Contracts – contracts
that are valid until annulled unless there has been ratification. Voidable
contracts are caused by vices of consent.
·
Unenforceable Contracts –
contracts that cannot be sued upon or enforced until ratified.
·
Void or inexistent contracts – contracts
that has no defect at all, they are null and void and cannot be rescinded.
CHAPTER 6 – RESCISSIBLE
CONTRACTS
2)
Rescission – is a remedy
granted by law to one of the contracting parties or to third person to secure
reparation of the damage caused by restoration of things to their condition in
which they were prior to the celebration of said contract.
3)
Requisites of Rescission
·
The contract must be validly
agreed upon
·
There must be lesion to one of
the contracting parties or third person
·
The rescission must be based
upon special cases provided by law
·
There must be no other remedy
to obtain reparation for the damage caused
·
The party asking for rescission
must be able to return what he is obliged to return by reason of the contract
·
The object of the contract must
not legally be in the possession of third person who did not act in bad faith
·
The period for filing the
action of rescission must not have prescribed
4)
Cases of rescissible contracts
specified by law
·
Those entered upon by guardians
when the ward suffered lesion by one-fourth of the value of the things which
are the object thereof.
·
Those entered in representation
of absentees, given that he suffered lesion by one-fourth of the value of the
object as well.
·
Those entered by reason of
defrauding creditors in which there is no other way for the creditor to claim
what is due to him.
·
Those things under litigation
given that the defendant has no knowledge and approval of the litigant or of
competent judicial authority.
·
Other cases specified by law
such as partition given that the co-heirs received things whose value is less
than one-fourth of the share that he is supposed to receive, noncompliance of
the lessor or lessee to their obligations, and vendee may exercise rescission
if the inferior value of the thing sold exceeds one-tenth of the price agreed
upon.
5)
Requisites for defrauding a
creditor to be rescinded
·
There must be a credit prior to
the contract to be rescinded, although it is not yet due
·
There must be fraud on the part
of the debtor which may be presumed or proved
·
There must be no other manner
by which the creditor can recover his credit, if not being required that the
debtor be insolvent
6)
Lis pendens – a party can file
this notice to protect his right for things under litigation
7)
Custodia Legis – if the thing
under litigation is a personal property
8)
Article 1382. Payments made in
a state of insolvency for obligations to whose fulfillment the debtor could not
be compelled at the time they were effected, are also rescissible.
9)
Article 1383. The action for
rescission is subsidiary; it cannot be instituted except when the party
suffering damage has no other legal means to obtain reparation for the same.
If the damage is repaired, as in the case of lesion suffered by the ward or absentee, rescission cannot take place.
If the damage is repaired, as in the case of lesion suffered by the ward or absentee, rescission cannot take place.
10)
Article 1384. Rescission shall
be only to the extent necessary to cover the damage.
The entire contract need not be extinguished if rescission can be applied partially.
The entire contract need not be extinguished if rescission can be applied partially.
11)
Mutual restitution in
rescission – when the court declares a contract rescinded, the parties must
return to each other (1) the object of the contract with its fruits and (2) the
price thereof with legal interest.
12)
When rescission not allowed
·
If the party demanding for
rescission cannot return what he is obliged to restore under the contract
·
When the thing or property is
in legal possession of a third person who acted in good faith, that is to say,
he acquired the property and registered it under the torrens system in the
Registry of property. In such case, the remedy is to demand indemnity for
damages from the person who caused the loss
13)
If a contract entered into in
behalf of a ward or absentee has been approved by the court, rescission cannot
take place because it is valid whether there is lesion or not.
14)
When alienation presumed in
fraud of creditors
·
Alienation by gratuitous title
·
Alienation by onerous title
given that some judgment has been issued against the seller
15)
Circumstances denominated as
badges of fraud
·
The fact that the consideration
of the conveyance is fictitious or inadequate
·
A transfer made by a debtor
after suit has begun and while it is pending against him
·
A sale upon credit by an
insolvent debtor
·
The transfer of all of his
property by a debtor, especially when he is insolvent or greatly embarrassed financially
·
The fact that the transfer is
made between father and son, when there are present some or any of the above
circumstances
·
The failure of the vendee to
take exclusive possession of all the property
·
It was known to the vendee that
the vendor has no other properties other than that sold to him
16)
Article 1388. Whoever acquires
in bad faith the things alienated in fraud of creditors, shall indemnify the
latter for damages suffered by them on account of the alienation, whenever, due
to any cause, it should be impossible for him to return them. If there are two
or more alienations, the first acquired shall be liable first, and so on
successively.
17)
As a general rule, the action
to claim rescission must be commenced within four years from the date the contract
was entered into. The exceptions are:
·
For persons under guardianship,
the period shall begin from the termination of incapacity
·
For absentees, from the time
the domicile is known
18)
Persons entitled to bring
action for rescission
·
The injured party or defrauded
creditor
·
His heirs, assigns, or
successors in interest
·
The creditors of the above
entitled to subrogation
CHAPTER
7 – VOIDABLE CONTRACTS
19)
Voidable or annullable
contracts – are those which possess all the essential requisites of a valid
contract but one of the parties is incapable of giving consent, or consent is
vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence, or fraud. They
are valid and binding unless annulled by a proper action in court. Once
ratified, they become absolutely valid and can no longer be annulled. Note that
the existence of damage is not essential for their annulment as in the case of
rescissible contracts.
20)
Annulment – is a remedy granted
by law, for reason of public interest, for the declaration of the inefficacy of
a contract based on a defect or vice in the consent of one of the contracting
parties in order to restore them to their original position in which they were
before the contract was executed.
21)
Period for filing action for
annulment- the four year period for bringing an action for annulment of a
voidable contract is reckoned:
·
In cases of intimidation,
violence or undue influence, from the time the intimidation, etc. ceases.
Before that time, the consent is still being vitiated and, therefore, the
victim cannot be expected to bring an action in court.
·
In case of mistake or fraud,
from the time it is discovered.
·
In the case of contracts
entered into by minors or incapacitated persons, from the time the guardianship
ceases. An incapacitated person has no capacity to sue.
22)
Ratification – cleanses the
contract from all its defects from the moment it was constituted. The contract
thus becomes valid. Hence, the action to annul is extinguished.
23)
Kinds of ratification
·
Express – when the ratification
is manifested in words or in writing
·
Implied or tacit – by silence
or acquiescence; by acts showing adoption or approval of the contract; or by
acceptance and retention of benefits flowing there from
24)
Requisites of ratification
·
There must be knowledge of the
reason which renders the contract voidable
·
Such reason must have ceased
·
The injured party must have
executed an act which necessarily implies an intention to waive his right
25)
Who may ratify?
·
A contract entered into by an
incapacitated person may be ratified by the guardian or the injured party
himself provided he is already capacitated.
·
In case of vices of consent,
ratification can be made by the party whose consent is vitiated.
26)
Article 1395. Ratification does
not require the conformity of the contracting party who has no right to bring
the action for annulment.
27)
Article 1396. Ratification
cleanses the contract from all its defects from the moment it was constituted.
28)
Requisites required to confer
the necessary capacity to bring an action for annulment
·
The plaintiff must have an
interest in the contract
·
The victim and not the party
responsible for the defect is the person who must assert the same
29)
One who is not a party to the
contract or an assignee thereunder, or does not represent those who took part
therein, has no legal capacity to challenge the validity of such contract.
Strangers are without right or personality to bring the action unless they can
show detriment.
30)
Guilty party, even his heirs or
successors, has no right to bring an action to the court.
31)
Article 1398. An obligation
having been annulled, the contracting parties shall restore to each other the
things which have been the subject matter of the contract, with their fruits,
and the price with its interest, except in cases provided by law. In
obligations to render service, the value thereof shall be the basis for
damages.
32)
Exception to the general rule
of mutual restitution: The incapacitated person is obliged to make restitution
only to the extent that he was benefited by the thing or price received by him.
33)
Effect of loss of thing to be
returned
·
If the thing to be returned is
lost without the fault of the person obliged to make restitution (defendant),
there is no more obligation to return such thing. But in such a case, the other
cannot be compelled to restore what in virtue of the decree of annulment he is
bound to return.
·
If it is lost through his
fault, his obligation is not extinguished but is converted into an indemnity
for damages consisting of the value of the thing at the time of the loss with
interest from the same date and the fruits received from the time the thing was
given to him to the time of its loss.
34)
Article 1401. The action for
annulment of contracts shall be extinguished when the thing which is the object
thereof is lost through the fraud or fault of the person who has a right to
institute the proceedings.
If the right of action is based upon the incapacity of any one of the contracting parties, the loss of the thing shall not be an obstacle to the success of the action, unless said loss took place through the fraud or fault of the plaintiff.
If the right of action is based upon the incapacity of any one of the contracting parties, the loss of the thing shall not be an obstacle to the success of the action, unless said loss took place through the fraud or fault of the plaintiff.
35)
There will be no annulment if
the party cannot restore what he is bound to return. This is true even if the
loss is due to a fortuitous event.
Chapter
8 – Unenforceable Contracts
36)
Unenforceable contracts – are
those that cannot be enforced in court or sued upon by reason of defects
provided by law until and unless they are ratified according to law.
37)
Kinds of unenforceable
contracts
·
Those entered into in the name
of another by one without or acting in excess of authority
·
Those that do not comply with
the Statute of Frauds
·
Those where both parties are
incapable of giving consent
38)
Unauthorized contracts – are
those entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no
authority or legal representation or who has acted beyond his powers.
39)
History of Statute of Frauds –
in 1677, the English parliament enacted a statute to counter the evil practice
of giving false testimony in actions founded on certain kinds of contracts.
40)
Purpose of the Statute of
Frauds – it has been enacted not only to prevent fraud but also to guard
against the mistakes of honest men by requiring that certain agreements be
specified must be in writing; otherwise, they are unenforceable by action in
court.
41)
Application of Statute of
Frauds
·
The Statute of Frauds is not
applicable in actions which are neither for damages because of a violation of a
contract nor for the specific performance thereof.
·
It is applicable only to
executor contracts (where no performance has as yet been made by both parties)
and not to contracts which are totally or partially performed.
·
It is not applicable where the
contract is admitted, expressly or impliedly, by the failure to deny
specifically its existence, no further evidence thereof being required in such
case.
·
It is applicable only to the
agreements enumerated therein. Thus, an agreement creating an easement of
right-of way is not covered by Statute since it is not a sale of real property
or of an interest therein.
·
It is not applicable where a
writing does not express the true agreement of the parties. This is so because
the Statute cannot be used as a shield for fraud or as a means for the
perpetration of it.
·
It does not declare that
contracts infringing it are void but merely unenforceable.
·
The defense of the Statute of
Frauds may be waived.
·
The defense of the Statute of
Frauds is personal to the parties and cannot be interposed by strangers to the
contract.
42)
Agreements within the scope of
the Statute of Frauds
·
Agreement not to be performed
within one year from the making thereof
·
Promise to answer for the debt,
default, or miscarriage of another
·
Agreement in consideration of
marriage other than a mutual promise to marry
·
Agreement in consideration of
marriage other than a mutual promise to marry
·
Agreements for sale of goods,
etc. at price not less than P500.
·
Agreement for leasing for a
longer period than one year
·
Agreement for the sale of real
property or of an interest therein
·
Representation as to the credit
of a third person
43)
Marriage Settlements – also
called ante-nuptial contracts, are agreements entered into by persons who are
about to be united in marriage and in consideration thereof, for the purpose of
fixing the conditions of their conjugal partnership with respect to their
present and future property.
44)
Donations proper nuptias – also
called donations by reason of marriage are those which are made before its
celebration, in consideration of the same and in favor of one or both of the
future spouses.
45)
Modes of ratification under the
statute
·
By failure to object to the presentation of
oral evidence to prove the contract
·
By acceptance of benefits under
the contract
46)
Art. 1406. When a contract is
enforceable under the Statute of Frauds, and a public document is necessary for
its registration in the Registry of Deeds, the parties may avail themselves of
the right under Art. 1357 (forms for convenience of the parties).
47)
Art. 1407. In a contract where
both the parties are incapable of giving consent, express or implied ratification
by the parent, or guardian, as the case may be, of one of the contracting
parties shall give the contract the same effect as if only one of them were
incapacitated (turned into voidable contract).
If ratification is made by the parents or guardians, as the case may be, of both contracting parties, the contract shall be validated from the inception.
If ratification is made by the parents or guardians, as the case may be, of both contracting parties, the contract shall be validated from the inception.
48)
Art. 1408. Unenforceable
contracts cannot be assailed by third persons.
It is a personal defense.
It is a personal defense.
Chapter
9 – Void or Inexistent Contracts
49)
Void contracts – are those
which, because of certain defects, generally produce no effect at all.
50)
Inexistent contracts – refer to
agreements which lack one or some or all of the elements which are essential
for the existence of a contract.
51)
Characteristics of a void or inexistent
contract
·
It cannot be ratified
·
The right to set up the defense
of illegality cannot be waived
·
The action or defense for the
declaration of its inexistence does not prescribe
·
The defense of illegality is
not available to third persons whose interests are not directly affected
·
It cannot give rise to a valid
contract
52)
Instances of void or inexistent
contracts
·
Contracts whose cause, object
or purpose is contrary to law, etc.
·
Contracts which are absolutely
simulated or fictitious
·
Contracts without cause or
object
·
Contracts whose object is
outside the commerce of men
·
Contracts which contemplate an
impossible service
·
Contracts where the intention
of the parties relative to the object cannot be ascertained (last resort rule)
·
Contracts expressly prohibited
or declared void by law
53)
Contracts expressly prohibited
or declared void by law
·
Contracts upon future
inheritance except in cases expressly authorized by law
·
Sale of property between
husband and wife except when there is a separation of property
·
Purchase of property by persons
who are specially disqualified by law (like guardians, agents, executors,
administrators, public officers, and employees, judges, lawyers, etc.) because
of their position or relation with the person or property under their care.
·
Donation between the spouses
during the marriage except moderate gifts
·
A testamentary provision in
favor of a disqualified person, even though made under the guise of an onerous
contract, or made through an intermediary, shall be void.
·
Any stipulation that household
service is without compensation shall be void
·
Members of Congress are
prohibited from being financially interested, directly or indirectly, in any
contract with the government or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof.
54)
Since a void contract has no
effect at all, it is therefore, unnecessary to bring an action to declare it
void. However, it is better that a judicial declaration of nullity be secured
not only to give peace of mind to the parties but also to avoid the taking of
the law into their own hands.
55)
Rules where contract is illegal
and the act constitutes a criminal offense
·
Where both parties are in pari
delicto – the parties shall have no action against each other, both shall be
prosecuted and the things or the price of the contract, as the effects or
instruments of the crime shall be confiscated in favor of the government
·
Where only one party is guilty
– the innocent one or the less guilty may claim what he has given and shall not
be bound to comply with his promise.
56)
Rules where contract is illegal
but the act does not constitute a criminal offense
·
Where both parties are in pari
delicto – neither party may recover what he has given by virtue of the contract
and neither party may demand the performance of the other’s undertaking
·
Where only one party is guilty
o
The guilty party loses what he
has given by reason of the contract
o
The guilty party cannot ask for
the fulfillment of the other’s undertaking
o
The innocent party may demand
the return of what he has given
o
The innocent party cannot be compelled
to comply with his promise
57)
Exceptions to the general rule
that when both parties are in pari delicto, the law refuses them every remedy
and leaves them where they are
·
Recovery of usurious interest
·
Recovery where contract is for
illegal purpose
·
Recovery by an incapacitated
person
·
Recovery where contract not
illegal per se
·
Recovery of amount paid in
excess of ceiling price
·
Recovery of additional
compensation for service beyond time limit
·
Recovery of amount of wage less
than minimum fixed
58)
Recovery of usurious interest –
a stipulation for the payment of usurious interest is void. The person paying
the usurious interest can recover in civil action not only the interest in
excess of that allowed by law, but the whole interest paid.
59)
Requisites in recovery where
contract is for illegal purpose
·
The contract is for an illegal
purpose
·
The contract is repudiated
before the purpose has been accomplished or before any damage has been caused
to a third person
·
The court considers that public
interest will be subserved by allowing recovery
60)
Art. 1415. Where one of the
parties to an illegal contract is incapable of giving consent, the courts may,
if the interest of justice so demands, allow recovery of money or property
delivered by the incapacitated person.
61)
Requisites of recovery where
contract not illegal per se
·
The agreement is not illegal
per se but is merely prohibited
·
The prohibition is designed for
the protection of the plaintiff
·
Public policy would be enhanced
by allowing the plaintiff to recover what he has paid or delivered
62)
Ceiling law – a statute fixing
the maximum price of any article or commodity
63)
The law (art. 1418 recovery of
additional compensation for service rendered beyond time limit) applies to
employees in all establishments and undertakings; whether for profit or not,
but not to:
·
Government employees
·
Managerial employees
·
Field personnel
·
Members of the family of the
employers who are dependent upon him for support
·
Domestic helpers
·
Persons in the personal service
of another
·
Workers who are paid by results
64)
Art. 1420. In case of a
divisible contract, if the illegal terms can be separated from the legal ones,
the latter may be enforced.
65)
Divisible contract
distinguished from divisible obligation – the test of the former is the
divisibility of its cause while the latter, its susceptibility of partial
fulfillment. The former, therefore, refers to the cause, while the latter, to
the prestation or object.
66)
Art. 1421. The defense of
illegality of contracts is not available to third person whose interests are
not directly affected. (Only those directly affected)
67)
Art. 1422. A contract which is
the direct result of a previous illegal contract is also void and inexistent.